diff --git a/Complexity.lean b/Complexity.lean
index 8b81552e6..771c03f79 100644
--- a/Complexity.lean
+++ b/Complexity.lean
@@ -823,6 +823,7 @@ public import Complexity.Computability.Interactive.Basic
 public import Complexity.Computability.Interactive.Plain
 public import Complexity.Computability.Interactive.Security
 public import Complexity.Computability.Interactive.Sequential
+public import Complexity.Computability.Interactive.Sumcheck
 public import Complexity.Computability.Kolmogorov.Basic
 public import Complexity.Computability.Kolmogorov.ChainRule
 public import Complexity.Computability.Kolmogorov.Depth
diff --git a/Complexity/Computability/Interactive/Sumcheck.lean b/Complexity/Computability/Interactive/Sumcheck.lean
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..b643dda5b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Complexity/Computability/Interactive/Sumcheck.lean
@@ -0,0 +1,334 @@
+/-
+Copyright (c) 2026 Samuel Schlesinger. All rights reserved.
+Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
+Authors: Samuel Schlesinger
+-/
+
+module
+-- upstream: candidate
+
+public import Complexity.Computability.Interactive.Sequential
+import Complexity.Probability.PMF
+import Complexity.Probability.PMF.Bind
+import Complexity.Probability.PMF.Uniform
+import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
+public import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Degrees
+public import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Defs
+
+/-!
+# The sumcheck protocol with a final evaluation check
+
+The index is a polynomial `P` in `n` variables over a finite field `F` with every individual
+degree at most `d`. A claim `(r, c)` at round `i` consists of the challenges `r : Fin i → F` of
+the earlier rounds and a value `c`. It states that the sum of `P` over the Boolean hypercube in
+the coordinates `i, …, n - 1`, with the coordinates below `i` fixed to `r`, is `c`
+(`Sumcheck.rel P i`). At round `0` this is the sumcheck claim `∑_{b ∈ {0,1}ⁿ} P b = c`, and at
+round `n` it is the evaluation claim `P r = c`.
+
+This is the protocol of Lund, Fortnow, Karloff and Nisan [LundFortnowKarloffNisan1992] as a
+composition of one-round reductions, with each challenge uniform on the field. Each round needs
+`i < n`: past the last variable the honest round polynomial is constant, and the round is neither
+complete nor round-by-round sound. The TQBF protocol in
+`Complexity.Computability.Complexity.Classes.IP.TQBF.Protocol` is a separate, unchanged
+development.
+
+## Main definitions
+
+* `Sumcheck.Claim F i`: the claims of round `i`, a point of `F^i` and a value.
+* `Sumcheck.partialSum P r`: the sum of `P` over the Boolean hypercube in the coordinates from
+  `i` on, with the coordinates below `i` fixed to `r : Fin i → F`.
+* `Sumcheck.round d P i` reduces `rel P i` to `rel P (i + 1)` in one prover message (a univariate
+  polynomial) and one uniform challenge `z`, and appends `z` to the point.
+* `Sumcheck.finalCheck P` reduces `rel P n` to acceptance by evaluating `P` without interaction.
+* `Sumcheck.proof d P` is `round 0`, …, `round (n - 1)`, by `Reduction.iterate`, followed by
+  `finalCheck`.
+
+## Main results
+
+* `Sumcheck.round_complete`, `Sumcheck.round_rbrSound`: each round is perfectly complete and
+  round-by-round sound with error `d / |F|`.
+* `Sumcheck.finalCheck_complete`, `Sumcheck.finalCheck_rbrSound`: the final check is perfectly
+  complete and round-by-round sound without error.
+* `Sumcheck.proof_complete`, `Sumcheck.proof_sound`: the end-to-end theorems, corollaries of the
+  component theorems through the composition theorems. The soundness error `n * (d / |F|)` is the
+  sum of the per-round errors, and no step of the composed protocol is reasoned about directly.
+
+## References
+
+* [C. Lund, L. Fortnow, H. Karloff, N. Nisan, *Algebraic methods for interactive proof
+  systems*][LundFortnowKarloffNisan1992]
+-/
+
+@[expose] public section
+
+namespace Cslib.Interactive.Sumcheck
+
+open scoped ENNReal
+open Spec
+
+variable {F : Type} [Field F] [Fintype F] [DecidableEq F] {n : ℕ} (d : ℕ)
+  (P : MvPolynomial (Fin n) F)
+
+/-- A claim of round `i`: the challenges of the rounds before `i` and the claimed value. -/
+abbrev Claim (F : Type) (i : ℕ) : Type := (Fin i → F) × F
+
+/-- The point of `F^n` equal to `r` on the first `i` coordinates and to the Boolean point `b` on
+the others. -/
+def point {i : ℕ} (r : Fin i → F) (b : Fin (n - i) → Bool) : Fin n → F :=
+  fun j => if h : j.val < i then r ⟨j.val, h⟩ else if b ⟨j.val - i, by omega⟩ then 1 else 0
+
+/-- The sum of `P` over the Boolean hypercube in the coordinates from `i` on, with the coordinates
+below `i` fixed to `r`. -/
+noncomputable def partialSum {i : ℕ} (r : Fin i → F) : F :=
+  ∑ b : Fin (n - i) → Bool, MvPolynomial.eval (point r b) P
+
+/-- The relation of round `i`: the claimed value is the partial sum. There is no witness. -/
+def rel (i : ℕ) : Claim F i → Unit → Prop := fun c _ => partialSum P c.1 = c.2
+
+/-- The honest message of round `i`: the partial sum as a polynomial in coordinate `i`. -/
+noncomputable def roundPoly {i : ℕ} (r : Fin i → F) : Polynomial F :=
+  ∑ b : Fin (n - (i + 1)) → Bool,
+    MvPolynomial.aeval (fun j => if h : j.val < i then Polynomial.C (r ⟨j.val, h⟩)
+      else if h' : j.val = i then Polynomial.X
+      else Polynomial.C (if b ⟨j.val - (i + 1), by omega⟩ then 1 else 0)) P
+
+/-- One round: the prover sends a polynomial, read in full; the verifier sends a field element. -/
+abbrev roundSpec (F : Type) [Semiring F] : Spec :=
+  [.prover (Polynomial F) (OracleInterface.full _), .verifier F]
+
+/-- The verifier's test of a round polynomial `g` against the claimed value `c`. -/
+abbrev accepts (c : F) (g : Polynomial F) : Prop := g.natDegree ≤ d ∧ g.eval 0 + g.eval 1 = c
+
+/-- Round `i` of sumcheck: on the claim `(r, c)` and the challenge `z`, the new claim is
+`(Fin.snoc r z, g.eval z)` for the prover's polynomial `g`. -/
+noncomputable def round (i : ℕ) :
+    Reduction OracleSpec.empty OracleSpec.empty (roundSpec F) (Claim F i) Unit (Claim F (i + 1))
+      Unit where
+  prover x _ :=
+    let g := roundPoly P x.1
+    pure (show ProbOracleComp OracleSpec.empty
+        (Polynomial F × (F → ProbOracleComp OracleSpec.empty _)) from
+      pure (g, fun z => pure ((Fin.snoc x.1 z, g.eval z), ())))
+  verifier :=
+    { samplers := (ProbComp.uniform F, ())
+      decide := fun x c => do
+        let g ← OracleComp.query (spec := OracleSpec.empty ⊕ₒ msgSpec (roundSpec F))
+          (.inr (.inl ()))
+        return if accepts d x.2 g then some (Fin.snoc x.1 c.1, g.eval c.1) else none }
+
+/-- The final check: evaluate `P` at the claimed point, without interaction. -/
+noncomputable def finalCheck :
+    Reduction OracleSpec.empty OracleSpec.empty [] (Claim F n) Unit Unit Unit where
+  prover _ _ := pure ((), ())
+  verifier :=
+    { samplers := ()
+      decide := fun x _ => pure (if MvPolynomial.eval x.1 P = x.2 then some () else none) }
+
+/-- **Sumcheck followed by the final check**: a proof system for the claim `∑_{b ∈ {0,1}ⁿ} P b = c`
+(`rel P 0`). -/
+noncomputable def proof :
+    Reduction OracleSpec.empty OracleSpec.empty (iterSpec (fun _ => roundSpec F) n ++ [])
+      (Claim F 0) Unit Unit Unit :=
+  (Reduction.iterate (s := fun _ => roundSpec F) (S := Claim F) (W := fun _ => Unit)
+    (round d P) n).append (finalCheck P)
+
+/-! ### The round polynomial -/
+
+omit [Fintype F] [DecidableEq F] in
+/-- Substituting the variable at coordinate `k` and constants elsewhere gives a polynomial of
+degree at most the degree of `P` in `k`. -/
+private theorem natDegree_aeval_le (k : Fin n) (φ : Fin n → Polynomial F)
+    (hφ : ∀ j, j ≠ k → (φ j).natDegree = 0) (hk : (φ k).natDegree ≤ 1) :
+    (MvPolynomial.aeval φ P).natDegree ≤ P.degreeOf k := by
+  conv_lhs => rw [P.as_sum, map_sum]
+  refine Polynomial.natDegree_sum_le_of_forall_le _ _ fun m hm => ?_
+  rw [MvPolynomial.aeval_monomial, Polynomial.algebraMap_eq]
+  refine (Polynomial.natDegree_C_mul_le _ _).trans ?_
+  refine (Polynomial.natDegree_prod_le _ _).trans ?_
+  refine le_trans ?_ (MvPolynomial.monomial_le_degreeOf k hm)
+  calc ∑ j ∈ m.support, ((φ j) ^ m j).natDegree
+      ≤ ∑ j ∈ m.support, if k = j then m j else 0 := by
+        refine Finset.sum_le_sum fun j _ => Polynomial.natDegree_pow_le.trans ?_
+        by_cases hj : k = j
+        · subst hj
+          simpa only [ite_true, mul_one] using Nat.mul_le_mul_left (m k) hk
+        · rw [hφ j (Ne.symm hj), mul_zero]
+          exact Nat.zero_le _
+    _ ≤ m k := by
+        rw [Finset.sum_ite_eq]
+        split_ifs <;> simp
+
+omit [Fintype F] [DecidableEq F] in
+/-- The round polynomial has degree at most `d`. -/
+private theorem natDegree_roundPoly_le (hP : ∀ j, P.degreeOf j ≤ d) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < n)
+    (r : Fin i → F) : (roundPoly P r).natDegree ≤ d := by
+  refine Polynomial.natDegree_sum_le_of_forall_le _ _ fun b _ => ?_
+  refine (natDegree_aeval_le P ⟨i, hi⟩ _ (fun j hj => ?_) ?_).trans (hP _)
+  · have : j.val ≠ i := fun h => hj (Fin.ext h)
+    split_ifs <;> exact Polynomial.natDegree_C _
+  · simp
+
+omit [Field F] [Fintype F] [DecidableEq F] in
+/-- The coordinate `j < i + 1` of `Fin.snoc r z`. -/
+private theorem snoc_mk {i : ℕ} (r : Fin i → F) (z : F) {j : ℕ} (hj : j < i + 1) :
+    (Fin.snoc r z : Fin (i + 1) → F) ⟨j, hj⟩ = if h : j < i then r ⟨j, h⟩ else z :=
+  rfl
+
+omit [Fintype F] [DecidableEq F] in
+/-- The round polynomial at `z` is the partial sum of the next round at the point extended
+by `z`. -/
+private theorem eval_roundPoly_eq {i : ℕ} (r : Fin i → F) (z : F) :
+    (roundPoly P r).eval z = partialSum P (Fin.snoc r z) := by
+  rw [roundPoly, Polynomial.eval_finsetSum, partialSum]
+  refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun b _ => ?_
+  rw [← Polynomial.coe_aeval_eq_eval, MvPolynomial.comp_aeval_apply,
+    MvPolynomial.aeval_eq_eval]
+  congr 2
+  funext j
+  simp only [point, snoc_mk]
+  split_ifs <;> first | omega | simp
+
+omit [Fintype F] [DecidableEq F] in
+/-- Split a Boolean point of length `m + 1` into its first coordinate and the others. -/
+private theorem sum_bool_succ {k m : ℕ} (h : k = m + 1) (f : (Fin k → Bool) → F) :
+    ∑ b, f b = ∑ c : Bool, ∑ b' : Fin m → Bool,
+      f (fun j => if h0 : j.val = 0 then c else b' ⟨j.val - 1, by omega⟩) := by
+  subst h
+  rw [← (Fin.consEquiv fun _ => Bool).sum_comp, Fintype.sum_prod_type]
+  refine Fintype.sum_congr _ _ fun c => Fintype.sum_congr _ _ fun b' => congrArg f ?_
+  funext j
+  refine Fin.cases ?_ (fun j => ?_) j <;> simp
+
+omit [Fintype F] [DecidableEq F] in
+/-- Fixing coordinate `i` to the Boolean value `c` is reading `c` as the first of the Boolean
+coordinates of round `i`. -/
+private theorem point_snoc {i : ℕ} (r : Fin i → F) (c : Bool) (b : Fin (n - (i + 1)) → Bool) :
+    point (Fin.snoc r (if c then (1 : F) else 0)) b =
+      point r (fun j => if h0 : j.val = 0 then c else b ⟨j.val - 1, by omega⟩) := by
+  funext j
+  simp only [point, snoc_mk]
+  split_ifs <;> first | omega | simp_all [Nat.sub_sub]
+
+omit [Fintype F] [DecidableEq F] in
+/-- The verifier's test passes on the honest round polynomial: its values at `0` and `1` sum to
+the partial sum. -/
+private theorem roundPoly_eval_zero_add_one {i : ℕ} (hi : i < n) (r : Fin i → F) :
+    (roundPoly P r).eval 0 + (roundPoly P r).eval 1 = partialSum P r := by
+  rw [eval_roundPoly_eq, eval_roundPoly_eq, add_comm]
+  conv_rhs => rw [partialSum, sum_bool_succ (show n - i = n - (i + 1) + 1 by omega),
+    Fintype.sum_bool]
+  congr 1
+  · exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun b _ => congrArg (MvPolynomial.eval · P) (point_snoc r true b)
+  · exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun b _ => congrArg (MvPolynomial.eval · P) (point_snoc r false b)
+
+omit [Fintype F] [DecidableEq F] in
+/-- At round `n` all coordinates are fixed: the partial sum is the evaluation. -/
+theorem partialSum_self (r : Fin n → F) : partialSum P r = MvPolynomial.eval r P := by
+  rw [partialSum, Finset.sum_eq_single (fun _ => false)]
+  · exact congrArg (MvPolynomial.eval · P) (funext fun j => dite_eq_left j.isLt)
+  · exact fun b _ hb => absurd (funext fun j => absurd j.isLt (by omega)) hb
+  · exact fun h => absurd (Finset.mem_univ _) h
+
+/-- The verifier of round `i` outputs the claim at the challenge if it accepts the message. -/
+private theorem round_outputOn (i : ℕ) (x : Claim F i) (τ : Transcript (roundSpec F)) :
+    (round d P i).verifier.outputOn x τ =
+      if accepts d x.2 τ.1 then some (Fin.snoc x.1 τ.2.1, τ.1.eval τ.2.1) else none :=
+  rfl
+
+/-! ### Component theorems (milestone 2) -/
+
+/-- Each round is perfectly complete. -/
+theorem round_complete (hP : ∀ j, P.degreeOf j ≤ d) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < n) :
+    (round d P i).Complete World.plain (rel P i) (rel P (i + 1)) 0 := by
+  intro x w hxw
+  rw [Reduction.run, World.plain_eval_execute, PMF.toOuterMeasure_map_apply]
+  simp only [round, runStrategy, plainLaw_bind, plainLaw_pure, plainLaw_sample, PMF.pure_bind,
+    PMF.bind_bind]
+  have hacc : accepts d x.2 (roundPoly P x.1) :=
+    ⟨natDegree_roundPoly_le d P hP hi x.1, (roundPoly_eval_zero_add_one P hi x.1).trans hxw⟩
+  rw [PMF.toOuterMeasure_bind_apply]
+  refine Probability.PMF.tsum_mul_le_of_forall_le _ fun z => le_of_eq ?_
+  refine (PMF.toOuterMeasure_pure_apply _ _).trans (ite_eq_right fun h => h ⟨?_, ?_⟩)
+  · exact (round_outputOn d P i x _).trans (ite_eq_left hacc)
+  · exact (eval_roundPoly_eq P x.1 z).symm
+
+/-- Each round is round-by-round sound with error `d / |F|` (Schwartz–Zippel for one variable). -/
+theorem round_rbrSound (hP : ∀ j, P.degreeOf j ≤ d) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < n) :
+    (round d P i).verifier.RbrSound (language (rel P i)) (language (rel P (i + 1)))
+      ((d : ℝ≥0∞) / Fintype.card F, ()) := by
+  refine ⟨fun x p => match p with
+    | none => partialSum P x.1 = x.2
+    | some (g, none) => accepts d x.2 g ∧ g = roundPoly P x.1
+    | some (g, some (z, _)) => accepts d x.2 g ∧ g.eval z = (roundPoly P x.1).eval z,
+    fun x hx h => hx ⟨(), h⟩, fun x => ⟨?_, fun g => ⟨?_, fun z => ?_⟩⟩⟩
+  · rintro hS m ⟨hacc, rfl⟩
+    exact hS ((roundPoly_eval_zero_add_one P hi x.1).symm.trans hacc.2)
+  · intro hS
+    change (ProbComp.eval (ProbComp.uniform F)).toOuterMeasure
+      {c | accepts d x.2 g ∧ g.eval c = (roundPoly P x.1).eval c} ≤ (d : ℝ≥0∞) / Fintype.card F
+    by_cases hacc : accepts d x.2 g
+    · have hne : g - roundPoly P x.1 ≠ 0 := sub_ne_zero.mpr fun h => hS ⟨hacc, h⟩
+      classical
+      rw [ProbComp.eval_uniform, Probability.PMF.toOuterMeasure_uniformOfFintype, div_eq_mul_inv]
+      gcongr
+      have hsub : Finset.univ.filter
+          (· ∈ {c | accepts d x.2 g ∧ g.eval c = (roundPoly P x.1).eval c}) ⊆
+          (g - roundPoly P x.1).roots.toFinset := by
+        intro c hc
+        simp only [Finset.mem_filter, Set.mem_ofPred_eq] at hc
+        rw [Multiset.mem_toFinset, Polynomial.mem_roots hne, Polynomial.IsRoot,
+          Polynomial.eval_sub, hc.2.2, sub_self]
+      exact_mod_cast (Finset.card_le_card hsub).trans ((Multiset.toFinset_card_le _).trans
+        ((Polynomial.card_roots' _).trans ((Polynomial.natDegree_sub_le _ _).trans
+          (max_le hacc.1 (natDegree_roundPoly_le d P hP hi x.1)))))
+    · simp [hacc]
+  · rintro hS ⟨x', ⟨_, hx'⟩, hout⟩
+    rw [round_outputOn] at hout
+    split_ifs at hout with hacc
+    obtain rfl := Option.some.inj hout
+    exact hS ⟨hacc, hx'.symm.trans (eval_roundPoly_eq P x.1 z).symm⟩
+
+omit [Fintype F] in
+/-- The final check is perfectly complete. -/
+theorem finalCheck_complete :
+    (finalCheck P).Complete World.plain (rel P n) Accept 0 := by
+  intro x w hxw
+  rw [rel, partialSum_self] at hxw
+  rw [Reduction.run, World.plain_eval_execute, PMF.toOuterMeasure_map_apply]
+  simp only [finalCheck, runStrategy, plainLaw_bind, plainLaw_pure, PMF.pure_bind]
+  refine le_of_eq ((PMF.toOuterMeasure_pure_apply _ _).trans
+    (ite_eq_right fun h => h ⟨?_, trivial⟩))
+  exact ite_eq_left hxw
+
+omit [Fintype F] in
+/-- The final check is round-by-round sound without error. -/
+theorem finalCheck_rbrSound :
+    (finalCheck P).verifier.RbrSound (language (rel P n)) Set.univ () := by
+  refine ⟨fun x _ => MvPolynomial.eval x.1 P = x.2,
+    fun x hx h => hx ⟨(), by rw [rel, partialSum_self]; exact h⟩,
+    fun x hS ⟨x', _, hout⟩ => hS ?_⟩
+  by_contra h
+  simp [Verifier.outputOn, finalCheck, h] at hout
+
+/-! ### End-to-end theorems, by composition -/
+
+/-- **Completeness of sumcheck with the final check.** -/
+theorem proof_complete (hP : ∀ j, P.degreeOf j ≤ d) :
+    (proof d P).Complete World.plain (rel P 0) Accept 0 := by
+  have h := (Reduction.Complete.iterate (rel := rel P) n fun i hi =>
+    round_complete d P hP hi).append (finalCheck_complete P)
+  simp only [Finset.sum_const_zero, add_zero] at h
+  exact h
+
+/-- **Soundness of sumcheck with the final check**: a false claim is accepted with probability at
+most `n * (d / |F|)`. -/
+theorem proof_sound (hP : ∀ j, P.degreeOf j ≤ d) :
+    (proof d P).verifier.Sound (oP := OracleSpec.empty) World.plain (language (rel P 0)) Set.univ
+      (n * ((d : ℝ≥0∞) / Fintype.card F)) := by
+  have h := ((Verifier.RbrSound.iterate (R := round d P) (L := fun i => language (rel P i)) n
+    fun i hi => round_rbrSound d P hP hi).append (finalCheck_rbrSound P)).sound
+  simp only [PerChallenge.sum_append, PerChallenge.sum_iterate] at h
+  simp only [PerChallenge.sum, add_zero, Finset.sum_const, Finset.card_range, nsmul_eq_mul] at h
+  exact h
+
+end Cslib.Interactive.Sumcheck
diff --git a/ComplexityTests.lean b/ComplexityTests.lean
index a5fbb8041..71769750b 100644
--- a/ComplexityTests.lean
+++ b/ComplexityTests.lean
@@ -426,6 +426,7 @@ import ComplexityTests.SparseLanguages
 import ComplexityTests.SparseMemory
 import ComplexityTests.StatefulRefinement
 import ComplexityTests.SubbotovskayaAndreev
+import ComplexityTests.Sumcheck
 import ComplexityTests.SynthesisBuilder
 import ComplexityTests.TFNP
 import ComplexityTests.TFNPCompleteness
diff --git a/ComplexityTests/Sumcheck.lean b/ComplexityTests/Sumcheck.lean
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..417825fd8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ComplexityTests/Sumcheck.lean
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+/-
+Copyright (c) 2026 Samuel Schlesinger. All rights reserved.
+Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
+Authors: Samuel Schlesinger
+-/
+
+import Complexity.Computability.Interactive.Sumcheck
+import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.ZMod
+import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Prime
+
+/-!
+# Tests for the sumcheck protocol
+
+The polynomial `X₀` in one variable over `ZMod 3` has individual degree `1`. Its hypercube sum is
+`0 + 1 = 1`, so the initial claim `(![], 1)` is true and `(![], 0)` is false. The end-to-end
+theorems apply: sumcheck with the final check is perfectly complete and has soundness error `1 / 3`.
+-/
+
+namespace ComplexityTests.Sumcheck
+
+open Cslib Cslib.Interactive Cslib.Interactive.Sumcheck
+open scoped ENNReal
+
+instance : Fact (Nat.Prime 3) := ⟨by norm_num⟩
+
+/-- The polynomial `X₀` over `ZMod 3`. -/
+noncomputable abbrev P : MvPolynomial (Fin 1) (ZMod 3) := MvPolynomial.X 0
+
+/-- `X₀` has individual degree at most `1`. -/
+theorem degreeOf_P_le (j : Fin 1) : P.degreeOf j ≤ 1 := by
+  rw [MvPolynomial.degreeOf_X]
+  split_ifs <;> simp
+
+/-- The hypercube sum of `X₀` is `1`. -/
+theorem partialSum_P : partialSum P (![] : Fin 0 → ZMod 3) = 1 := by
+  change ∑ b : Fin 1 → Bool, MvPolynomial.eval (point ![] b) P = 1
+  rw [← (Equiv.funUnique (Fin 1) Bool).symm.sum_comp]
+  simp [point]
+
+/-- The true claim. -/
+example : rel P 0 (![], 1) () := partialSum_P
+
+/-- A false claim. -/
+example : ¬ rel P 0 (![], 0) () := by
+  simp [rel, partialSum_P]
+
+/-- Sumcheck with the final check is perfectly complete on this instance. -/
+example : (proof 1 P).Complete World.plain (rel P 0) Accept 0 :=
+  proof_complete 1 P degreeOf_P_le
+
+/-- Sumcheck with the final check is sound with error `1 / 3` on this instance. -/
+example :
+    (proof 1 P).verifier.Sound (oP := OracleSpec.empty) World.plain (language (rel P 0)) Set.univ
+      (1 / 3) := by
+  simpa using proof_sound 1 P degreeOf_P_le
+
+/--
+info: 'Cslib.Interactive.Sumcheck.proof_complete' depends on axioms: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound]
+-/
+#guard_msgs in
+#print axioms Cslib.Interactive.Sumcheck.proof_complete
+
+/--
+info: 'Cslib.Interactive.Sumcheck.proof_sound' depends on axioms: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound]
+-/
+#guard_msgs in
+#print axioms Cslib.Interactive.Sumcheck.proof_sound
+
+end ComplexityTests.Sumcheck
diff --git a/ROADMAP.md b/ROADMAP.md
index a26d0999c..8959fa81e 100644
--- a/ROADMAP.md
+++ b/ROADMAP.md
@@ -1232,7 +1232,9 @@ Jukna coverage below is an additional target beyond the V1 port:
   [sequential composition](Complexity/Computability/Interactive/Sequential.lean) is proved for
   completeness, soundness, knowledge soundness and round-by-round soundness, and so is per-stage
   iteration. [Round-by-round soundness implies soundness](Complexity/Computability/Interactive/Plain.lean).
-  Sumcheck, the first client, is in review (#703). Open, in order:
+  [Sumcheck with a final evaluation check](Complexity/Computability/Interactive/Sumcheck.lean),
+  the first client, is perfectly complete and has soundness error `n · d / |F|`; both follow from
+  the one-round theorems by composition. Open, in order:
   - the `PublicCoin → IP` bridge, with a uniform word verifier and adversarial decoding;
   - parallel and AND/OR composition, and round-by-round knowledge soundness;
   - oracle statements. Today a later phase cannot query an earlier phase's oracle message,