Repository navigation
Bugfix/issue 2495 - #2501
Merged
Merged
Bugfix/issue 2495#2501
Conversation
added 2 commits
October 11, 2026 23:17
The leak happened during translation of a array-like Variant into Python. Unlike PyList_SetItem, PyDict_SetItem does not steal references to the objects passed :(
Contributor
|
Hi @klayoutmatthias, thanks for the bugfix! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The issue was due to a pending reference during the conversion of dict-like Variant objects to Python. Unlike "PyList_SetItem", "PyDict_SetItem" does not steal a reference to the value :(
It's good that is fixed.