Repository navigation
Brändén–Leite: r ≠ 0 for natural-number hypotheses - #2527
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Project style prefers n ≠ 0 over positivity for ℕ. Leftover from the 11-08 review of the Codex-written Brändén–Leite files (#2442); no downstream users. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cleanup after the Codex-written Brändén–Leite files (#2442): the 13 natural-number hypotheses
0 < r/0 < jinBrandenLeite/MarkedShift,WeightedShiftTilingandOptionalRiseMatrixbecomer ≠ 0/j ≠ 0(project style). No downstream users (checked real-rooted-oeis-proofs).Local checks: focused builds of the three modules and the catalog page,
runLinteron each.🤖 Generated with Claude Code