Repository navigation
refactor: adopt shared README table formatting - #293
Conversation
- Use published research-repo-tools v0.2.0 table styles for dimensions, confidence bounds, and explicitly directed speedup ratios. - Retire legacy CSV conversion and pre-Just phase replay while preserving historical reports, assets, and evidence. - Retain la-stack integration coverage and consolidate package identity checks, leaving shared implementation matrices upstream. Refs #285
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info
📝 Walkthrough
Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #293 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.25% 98.25%
=======================================
Files 14 14
Lines 7218 7218
=======================================
Hits 7092 7092
Misses 126 126
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. |
The README benchmark publisher rewrites shared Markdown cells and prose to obtain its six-column table. Adopt the published
research-repo-tools==0.2.0RunTableStyleAPI directly, preserving mean/median selection, recorded interval bounds, the confidence caption, explicit speedup direction, original peer phases, and the README figure and transactional asset pointers.Remove the obsolete CSV conversion declaration and pre-Just Python phase replay. Historical reports, CSV/JSON, provenance, archives, and measured assets remain unchanged. Remove shared implementation test matrices already covered by the published upstream suite, consolidate exact package pin/registry/distribution checks, and retain la-stack's scientific, native-recipe, release, and publication integration coverage.
Validation on macOS:
just python-check,just markdown-fix,just check, andjust cipassed. Final CI includes 160 Python tests, 1,031 Rust tests, default/exact doctests, and the remaining configuration, documentation, build, and example checks. Focused coverage runs the actualjust performance-readmerecipe against the installed package for mean and median; offline rendering of the retained published run preserves SVG and CSV bytes. Refreshing the current README correctly rejects its existing stale source digest without changing publication files. New benchmark measurements are unnecessary for this presentation and tooling cleanup.Native Linux/macOS/Windows CI on the PR supplies the remaining adoption-commit validation required by #285.
Closes #285
Summary by CodeRabbit
Updates
research-repo-tools0.2.0.Documentation
Validation