Fix VR start on shared network with multiple guest IP ranges

[sureshanaparti]

Description

This PR fixes the VR start on shared network with multiple guest IP ranges.

Fixes #13616

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• Build/CI
• Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[sureshanaparti]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 4.02%. Comparing base (2e63c60) to head (f12f1bf).

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (2e63c60) and HEAD (f12f1bf). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE

Flag	BASE (2e63c60)	HEAD (f12f1bf)
unittests	1	0

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##               4.22   #14282       +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage     18.00%    4.02%   -13.99%     
=============================================
  Files          5936      449     -5487     
  Lines        535716    38239   -497477     
  Branches      65596     7082    -58514     
=============================================
- Hits          96459     1538    -94921     
+ Misses       428268    36489   -391779     
+ Partials      10989      212    -10777     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	4.02% <ø> (ø)
unittests	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[weizhouapache]

code lgtm

@sureshanaparti
can you share what you have verified ?

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 19366

[DaanHoogland]

clgtm, wonder if we can find further edge cases. The issue looks like addressed by this change, though.