Skip to content

fix(flow): keep inspection planning on the configured path - #216

Merged
vriesd merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/inspection-planning-guidance
Oct 29, 2026
Merged

vriesd merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/inspection-planning-guidance

Conversation

@vriesd

@vriesd vriesd commented Oct 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

An inspection run could call an unconfigured planning specialist, then stop after saving a draft whose paraphrased goal could not receive the existing inspection continuation. Make specialist dispatch conditional and put the exact-goal rule in the planning guide that the router loads.

Also accept actionable numbered phase titles under an explicitly phased roadmap when the required standalone finding interrupts list indentation. The grader still requires ordered peer phases, concrete actions and targets, and section boundaries. Add the retained document as a regression fixture with adversarial cases.

Proof: the new regressions fail before the fix; 663 focused tests, typecheck, and packed native smoke (2 tests, 128 assertions using a local scripted provider) pass. Clean push preflight passes: 5,787 tests passed, 27 skipped, zero failures; all 13 gated replays reproduce.

The stopped campaign remains NOT VERIFIED (57 passes, 2 failures, 22 missing). Original receipts remain unchanged. These guidance edits change the package bytes; a freshly sealed artifact and separately approved complete campaign are still required. Live adherence is unmeasured. Dependency updates #213 and #214 remain separate to preserve the qualification toolchain while isolating this behavior correction.

Reviewed with sol-loop: 1 round with gpt-6.1-sol. Sol verdict: approved.

Created with gpt-6.1-sol in T3 Code through the Codex harness.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-29T02:47:44.095519Z af03f55 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@vriesd
vriesd merged commit fdd11b7 into main Oct 29, 2026
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants