Repository navigation
Spec 017: the shifted-prior gap, test record on seed 344, panel review, write-up and slides - #35
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…tracks Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.2 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019erPajyAwQ6mBQ2Xz4xNHs
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.2 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019erPajyAwQ6mBQ2Xz4xNHs
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.2 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019erPajyAwQ6mBQ2Xz4xNHs
…ecord's corrections Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.2 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019erPajyAwQ6mBQ2Xz4xNHs
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.2 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019erPajyAwQ6mBQ2Xz4xNHs
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Spec 017's test on seed 344 (scored once, plan
tl-f.jsonas registered), the five-reviewer panel, and the two posts. PR 34 merged the study's code and registration. A registered study, not a gate; nothing trained, nothing spent.Record (
experiments/20261114-tl5/; shifted split, 451 scored periods):Panel, round 1 (
review.md): five approve with findings; every number reproduces. The reading is narrowed:Also: write-up
site/blog/2026-11-14-shifted-gap.md, slides post and deck, figures with sidecars, scriptstl5_{supplement,tracks,charts}.py, AGENTS.md (results, gotchas, next fresh seed 345), tasks ticked.Recommended follow-on (owner's choice): a manoeuvre prior that adapts to the period, classical and on CPU, registered against the control with the true-prior search as its ceiling; no GPU proposer now.
Not delivered: the split under each way of fitting the reference; course and speed in the estimands; a joint detectability; unit tests for
detect.pyandrun5.py.No SRD, annex or constitution change in this PR.
Test plan
uv run pytest -q tests/unit/test_timelate5.py(tables regenerate from the summary)uv run ruff check .andruff format --check .🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_019erPajyAwQ6mBQ2Xz4xNHs