Skip to content

[bot] Merge master/84eedf18 into rel/dev - #1939

Merged
yenkins-admin merged 3 commits into
rel/devfrom
snapshot-master-84eedf18-to-rel/dev
Nov 11, 2026
Merged

yenkins-admin merged 3 commits into
rel/devfrom
snapshot-master-84eedf18-to-rel/dev

Conversation

@yenkins-admin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Automated PR to perform merge from master into rel/dev with changes up to 84eedf1 (created by https://github.com/gooddata/gooddata-python-sdk/actions/runs/42960722333).

oanhca1367-lgtm and others added 3 commits November 11, 2026 11:28
The document skill scored new drafts only: a run that edited the
document open in the editor failed on base_document_id, so a dataset
could not check the copilot's edits at all.

An item can now state `rework` with the base_document_id of the open
document. The run must then report that id and
reworks_open_document, and it may also have to keep listed page ids
(a hidden page counts as lost), keep listed charts on their pages,
leave a stated title, and keep the document's content.filters. Each is a strict check published only
when the item states it. A new draft must not claim
reworks_open_document either: that, and a base_document_id on a new
draft, now fail document_new_draft rather than document_not_saved,
which keeps meaning only that the draft is not saved yet.

A rework is scored on aac-v2 documents only: a v1 draft fails it
once, saying so, rather than through every check. v1 is on its way
out, and its parts carry the Report names the wire check already
flags.

A malformed rework is rejected before any request, and so is one
whose base_document_id is not the id of user_context.view.document:
otherwise every run would fail on base_document_id and read as a
copilot regression. Expected filters are compared as sent, keyed by
filter id, so they have to be copied from a real aac-v2 run.

jira: QA-30024
risk: low
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011CpUh9hFjL8SbdpFxBGRXp
A general question about the document open in user_context ran in
the organization's default document format. On an organization that
defaults to aac-v1, the agent got report_builder instead of
document_builder and could read only the context summary of an aac-v2
document, so it could not say which charts the document shows.

evaluate_agentic_general_question and run_agentic_general_question
now take document_format, as the document skill does. It is sent on
every turn, recorded in the dataset-run metadata, and an unknown
value is rejected before any request. None keeps the server default.

jira: QA-30024
risk: low
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011CpUh9hFjL8SbdpFxBGRXp
…coring

feat(gooddata-eval): evaluate the copilot with a document open
@yenkins-admin
yenkins-admin merged commit cccf56e into rel/dev Nov 11, 2026
1 check passed
@yenkins-admin
yenkins-admin deleted the snapshot-master-84eedf18-to-rel/dev branch November 11, 2026 04:40
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

Run configuration

  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: Organization UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: ad99c49e-0569-446c-b39c-2ca9e77829fc

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • Trigger review
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Nov 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.31%. Comparing base (d21b53f) to head (84eedf1).
⚠️ Report is 646 commits behind head on rel/dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           rel/dev    #1939      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    86.24%   86.31%   +0.07%     
===========================================
  Files          346      346              
  Lines        26261    26397     +136     
===========================================
+ Hits         22649    22785     +136     
  Misses        3612     3612              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants