chore: release main

.release-please-manifest.json

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 {
-  ".": "0.28.0",
-  "adk": "0.28.0"
+  ".": "0.28.1",
+  "adk": "0.28.1"
 }

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -12,6 +12,14 @@
 
 * **tracing:** emit OTel metrics for async span queue depth, batch drain, and SGP export success/failure (HTTP status labels). Disable SDK-side recording with ``AGENTEX_TRACING_METRICS=0``.
 
+## 0.28.1 (2026-09-22)
+
+Full Changelog: [agentex-client-v0.28.0...agentex-client-v0.28.1](https://github.com/scaleapi/scale-agentex-python/compare/agentex-client-v0.28.0...agentex-client-v0.28.1)
+
+### Bug Fixes
+
+* **acp:** await task/create instead of backgrounding it ([#519](https://github.com/scaleapi/scale-agentex-python/issues/519)) ([18926e8](https://github.com/scaleapi/scale-agentex-python/commit/18926e824518d9ecd417856f5398ad2bfa64869f))
+
 ## 0.28.0 (2026-09-18)
 
 Full Changelog: [agentex-client-v0.27.0...agentex-client-v0.28.0](https://github.com/scaleapi/scale-agentex-python/compare/agentex-client-v0.27.0...agentex-client-v0.28.0)

adk/CHANGELOG.md

@@ -1,5 +1,13 @@
 # Changelog
 
+## 0.28.1 (2026-09-22)
+
+Full Changelog: [agentex-sdk-v0.28.0...agentex-sdk-v0.28.1](https://github.com/scaleapi/scale-agentex-python/compare/agentex-sdk-v0.28.0...agentex-sdk-v0.28.1)
+
+### Chores
+
+* **agentex-sdk:** Synchronize agentex versions
+
 ## 0.28.0 (2026-09-18)
 
 Full Changelog: [agentex-sdk-v0.27.0...agentex-sdk-v0.28.0](https://github.com/scaleapi/scale-agentex-python/compare/agentex-sdk-v0.27.0...agentex-sdk-v0.28.0)

adk/pyproject.toml

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 # (agentex/{__init__.py, _*.py, types/, resources/}) ships from the slim
 # sibling package `agentex-client` which is pinned as a runtime dep.
 name = "agentex-sdk"
-version = "0.28.0"
+version = "0.28.1"
 description = "Agent Development Kit (ADK) overlay for the Agentex API — FastACP server, Temporal workflows, LLM provider integrations, observability"
 license = "Apache-2.0"
 authors = [

pyproject.toml

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 # overlay (formerly `src/agentex/lib/*`) now lives in `adk/` and ships
 # as the sibling `agentex-sdk` package — see `adk/pyproject.toml`.
 name = "agentex-client"
-version = "0.28.0"
+version = "0.28.1"
 description = "The official Python REST client for the Agentex API"
 dynamic = ["readme"]
 license = "Apache-2.0"

src/agentex/_version.py

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 # File generated from our OpenAPI spec by Stainless. See CONTRIBUTING.md for details.
 
 __title__ = "agentex"
-__version__ = "0.28.0"  # x-release-please-version
+__version__ = "0.28.1"  # x-release-please-version

src/agentex/protocol/acp.py

@@ -127,8 +127,23 @@ class InterruptTaskParams(BaseModel):
     )
 
 
+# Methods whose handler must finish before the RPC responds.
+#
+# TASK_CREATE is here because its whole contract is to hand back an id for a
+# task that now exists. Its handler starts the Temporal workflow, so answering
+# before the handler runs returns an id the server cannot yet route to: a caller
+# that follows task/create with event/send can have its signal arrive first and
+# be dropped with `workflow not found`. Nothing batches task creations, so there
+# is no benefit to trade against, and start_workflow is a short RPC.
+#
+# EVENT_SEND deliberately stays asynchronous. Callers send events in quick
+# succession and the workflow drains them as a batch; awaiting each send
+# serialises them and no batch ever holds more than one event. Once TASK_CREATE
+# is synchronous the workflow is addressable before any event is sent, which is
+# what the race needed.
 RPC_SYNC_METHODS = [
     RPCMethod.MESSAGE_SEND,
+    RPCMethod.TASK_CREATE,
 ]
 
 PARAMS_MODEL_BY_METHOD: dict[RPCMethod, type[BaseModel]] = {

tests/test_acp_sync_dispatch.py

@@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
+"""Unit tests for the dispatch mode of ``task/create`` and ``event/send``.
+
+``task/create`` hands back an id for a task that now exists, and its handler is
+what starts the Temporal workflow. Dispatching it in the background answered
+before the handler ran, so the id named a workflow the server could not yet
+route to. A caller that followed ``task/create`` with ``event/send`` could have
+its signal arrive first and be dropped with ``workflow not found``, and it saw
+success either way because the handler's exception was raised into a background
+task that only logged it.
+
+``event/send`` keeps its background dispatch on purpose: callers send events in
+quick succession and the workflow drains them as a batch, which awaiting each
+send would serialise. These tests pin both halves so neither is changed by
+accident:
+
+1. ``task/create`` finishes its handler before responding, and surfaces a
+   handler failure as a JSON-RPC error.
+2. ``event/send`` still acknowledges immediately without waiting.
+
+``SyncACP`` is used as the transport because it constructs with no Temporal
+connection and no network, and the dispatch under test lives in the shared
+``BaseACPServer``.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import asyncio
+from typing import Any
+
+import pytest
+
+from agentex.types.task import Task
+from agentex.types.agent import Agent
+from agentex.types.event import Event
+from agentex.protocol.acp import (
+    RPC_SYNC_METHODS,
+    RPCMethod,
+    SendEventParams,
+    CreateTaskParams,
+)
+from agentex.protocol.json_rpc import JSONRPCResponse
+from agentex.lib.sdk.fastacp.impl.sync_acp import SyncACP
+
+
+def _agent() -> Agent:
+    return Agent(
+        id="test-agent-456",
+        name="test-agent",
+        description="test-agent",
+        acp_type="async",
+        created_at="2023-01-01T00:00:00Z",
+        updated_at="2023-01-01T00:00:00Z",
+    )
+
+
+def _task() -> Task:
+    return Task(id="test-task-123", status="RUNNING")
+
+
+def _event() -> Event:
+    return Event(
+        id="test-event-789",
+        agent_id="test-agent-456",
+        sequence_id=1,
+        task_id="test-task-123",
+    )
+
+
+def _create_params() -> CreateTaskParams:
+    return CreateTaskParams(agent=_agent(), task=_task(), params=None)
+
+
+def _event_params() -> SendEventParams:
+    return SendEventParams(agent=_agent(), task=_task(), event=_event())
+
+
+class _FakeRequest:
+    """The slice of ``starlette.requests.Request`` that ``_handle_jsonrpc`` uses."""
+
+    def __init__(self, payload: dict[str, Any]) -> None:
+        self._payload = payload
+        self.headers: dict[str, str] = {}
+
+    async def json(self) -> dict[str, Any]:
+        return self._payload
+
+
+def _rpc(method: RPCMethod, params: Any) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    return {
+        "jsonrpc": "2.0",
+        "method": method.value,
+        "params": params.model_dump(mode="json"),
+        "id": f"{method.value}-test",
+    }
+
+
+async def _dispatch(acp: SyncACP, method: RPCMethod, params: Any) -> JSONRPCResponse:
+    """Call the JSON-RPC entry point and narrow its untyped return."""
+    response = await acp._handle_jsonrpc(_FakeRequest(_rpc(method, params)))  # pyright: ignore[reportArgumentType]
+    assert isinstance(response, JSONRPCResponse)
+    return response
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Which methods are synchronous
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+class TestSyncMethodSet:
+    @pytest.mark.parametrize("method", [RPCMethod.MESSAGE_SEND, RPCMethod.TASK_CREATE])
+    def test_method_is_synchronous(self, method: RPCMethod) -> None:
+        assert method in RPC_SYNC_METHODS
+
+    def test_event_send_stays_asynchronous(self) -> None:
+        # Batching depends on it: callers send events in quick succession and the
+        # workflow drains them together. Awaiting each send serialises them.
+        assert RPCMethod.EVENT_SEND not in RPC_SYNC_METHODS
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# task/create: handler completes before the response
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+class TestTaskCreateAwaitsHandler:
+    async def test_handler_runs_before_response(self) -> None:
+        acp = SyncACP()
+        order: list[str] = []
+
+        @acp.on_task_create
+        async def handler(params: CreateTaskParams) -> None:
+            # Yield control so a backgrounded handler would lose the race and
+            # let the response be sent first.
+            await asyncio.sleep(0)
+            order.append("handler")
+
+        response = await _dispatch(acp, RPCMethod.TASK_CREATE, _create_params())
+        order.append("response")
+
+        assert order == ["handler", "response"]
+        assert response.error is None
+        assert response.result != {"status": "processing"}
+
+    async def test_handler_failure_returns_error(self) -> None:
+        acp = SyncACP()
+
+        @acp.on_task_create
+        async def handler(params: CreateTaskParams) -> None:
+            raise RuntimeError("workflow not found for ID: test-task-123")
+
+        response = await _dispatch(acp, RPCMethod.TASK_CREATE, _create_params())
+
+        assert response.error is not None
+        assert "workflow not found" in response.error.message
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# event/send: acknowledges without waiting
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+class TestEventSendIsBackgrounded:
+    async def test_response_does_not_wait_for_handler(self) -> None:
+        acp = SyncACP()
+        started = asyncio.Event()
+        order: list[str] = []
+
+        @acp.on_task_event_send
+        async def handler(params: SendEventParams) -> None:
+            await asyncio.sleep(0)
+            order.append("handler")
+            started.set()
+
+        response = await _dispatch(acp, RPCMethod.EVENT_SEND, _event_params())
+        order.append("response")
+
+        # The acknowledgment comes back before the handler has run, which is what
+        # lets a caller enqueue several events without waiting on each one.
+        assert order == ["response"]
+        assert response.result == {"status": "processing"}
+
+        # The handler still runs, just afterwards.
+        await asyncio.wait_for(started.wait(), timeout=5)
+        assert order == ["response", "handler"]