Skip to content

docs(privacy): describe the daily energy report - #43

Open
frahlg wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
privacy-energy-report
Open

frahlg wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
privacy-energy-report

Conversation

@frahlg

@frahlg frahlg commented Nov 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Problem

From the first Core beta after 12 November 2026, boxes send the daily energy report straight to FTW Cloud (srcfl/ftw#2007, srcfl/ftw-cloud#61). The privacy page describes the fleet report and the hourly statistics, but not this report.

Change

One paragraph in English and Swedish under "Project statistics": what the energy report carries (six whole-kWh sums of one closed UTC day and the date), that it has no box id and leaves at its own time, that Cloud sees the address while receiving it and stores neither the report nor the address, the public floor (5 reports, four days after the day ends, small sums hidden), and that the same statistics answer covers both reports. "Updated" moves to 12 November 2026.

Order

Merge with, or just before, the Core beta that carries srcfl/ftw#2007.

Evidence

Checked the Swedish page renders the new paragraph in a browser (file preview).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Core sends the energy report straight to FTW Cloud from the first beta after
12 November 2026. The privacy page described only the fleet report and the
hourly statistics.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-12T09:39:31.338557Z 352b0cc PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant