Repository navigation
meta: update readme and agents.md - #412
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.
|
| Layer / File(s) | Summary |
|---|---|
Contributor and package guidance AGENTS.md, README.md |
AGENTS.md adds dependency-injection examples, commit-message guidance, and a concurrency recommendation. README.md names XKit and XToolSupport as Swift Package dependencies and clarifies Swift interface stability. |
AI assistance disclosure wording .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md |
The template asks how much PR code was AI-assisted. Its first option specifies assistance in writing code and review of the finished result. |
Priority:
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes
Change: Other
Possibly related PRs
- xtool-org/xtool#375: Adds the
ddependency accessor and concernsXToolSupportpackage dependencies, which the updated guidance and README reference.
Merge Risk: 
Minimal · up to e4ef3
-
No actionable merge-blocking issue is established for these documentation changes; they appear mergeable after normal checks.
Pre-merge checks: 
4
-
Full details: Title check
-
Explanation
The title "meta: update readme and agents.md" matches the main change. The PR updates README.md and AGENTS.md, which are the two files with substantive edits. The title names the files but not the specific changes, such as the Swift dependency-injection example, the Task.detached guidance, or the README note on Swift interface semver. It is a fair summary of the scope, and a reviewer scanning history can tell what was touched.
-
Finishing Touches
-
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
-
- Commit to this branch
- Create a new PR
-
- Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
55db619 to
e4ef367
Compare

What does this PR do?
Updates readme & agents guidance
How was it tested?
i read it back with mine own eyes
AI tool usage
How much of this PR was AI-assisted? (check one)
Summary by CodeRabbit