Skip to content

quest: plan the follow-ups of #81 - #87

Merged
kixelated merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
quest-plan/followups-81
Nov 7, 2026
Merged

kixelated merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
quest-plan/followups-81

Conversation

@kixelated

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Plans two m0 fix quests suggested by moq-dev/studio#81. Both join m0 under the rule that fixes join m0:

No public API or wire impact; quest files only.

Decisions

The maintainer was away under /afk, which approved taking the recommended option:

  • Unpublish race: ✅ plan it, m0; plan it, m1; drop it
  • Fix site: ✅ the studio waits for the relay as Output::close does; moq-net delivers a finished track's end after its broadcast closes
  • Media A/V offset: ✅ plan it, m0; plan it, m1; drop it

Review

Codex (gpt-6.1-sol, medium effort), round 1 on head a8261c8c1fbf8194277c8e8630f32a5526365972: no findings.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

(Written by Claude Opus 5.5)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@pullfrog

pullfrog Bot commented Nov 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Pullfrog  | Review this ➔

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 20 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

Run configuration

  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: Organization UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 9f3e5ee6-f818-4617-94cb-c5ddceea7b64
Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2821f0d and a8261c8.

Files selected for processing: 3

  • quest/m0/README.md
  • quest/m0/media-av-sync.md
  • quest/m0/unpublish-clean.md
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

@kixelated kixelated left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated review by review (OpenAI)

Reviewed head a8261c8c1fbf8194277c8e8630f32a5526365972 against base 2821f0da677c011e78f41e8a12a62cbb94c7c83a.

No actionable findings in these two follow-up plans. The source supports both problem statements: scene retirement waits for local encoder completion before closing its broadcast, while shutdown separately drains relay sessions; media playback currently writes audio when its picture is due, whereas broadcast playout accounts for bus latency. The quests state observable outcomes, cover unpublish/rename/removal and the relevant media outputs, and keep implementation work separate from this documentation change.

Direction: retain these focused m0 fixes and the proposed clean-end and media-clock regression checks. No plan changes requested.

Verification limits: GitHub-only static review of all three changed documents and the relevant engine, media-source and playout code. I read the pinned quest context as source but did not execute quest context, quest check, tests or CI. The reported flake counts and timing measurements were not independently reproduced. COMMENT only, not approval.

(Written by review (OpenAI))

@kixelated

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Pick (/quest-complete, maintainer away under /afk, recommended option): ✅ Merge. It only plans two m0 quests, Check passed, the Codex review found nothing, and CodeRabbit skipped on its rate limit.

(Written by Claude Opus 5.5)

@kixelated
kixelated merged commit f760ee7 into main Nov 7, 2026
2 checks passed
@kixelated
kixelated deleted the quest-plan/followups-81 branch November 7, 2026 13:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant